In Re Philpott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• four year maximum period under Sec. 3000 overrides reconfinement authorization of Sec. 3057(a)
• four year maximum period under § 3000 overrides reconfinement authorization of § 3057(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Terhune v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1998-07-24· cited 55×
• In Re Valenti
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-03-05· cited 18×
• COX v. McCARTHY
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-10-01· cited 15×
• In Re Barnes
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-12-30· cited 3×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Dillon
  California Supreme Court· 1983-09-01· cited 1,034×
• People v. Black
  California Supreme Court· 1982-07-29· cited 105×
• Sacramento Typographical U. No. 46 v. St. of Calif
  California Court of Appeal· 1971-07-09· cited 6×
• In Re Schaefer
  California Court of Appeal· 1981-02-18· cited 3×