In Re Philip R. Thrift and Charles T. Hemphill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating a board decision because it “failed to provide an adequate ground” for rejecting a -claim
• refusing to sustain an obviousness rejection based on a new prior art reference not relied on by the Board because it would require a determination of the scope of that reference and whether it provided a motivation to combine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).