Skip to main content
· 3/30/1999

Federal Case

Citations

  • 172 F.3d 270

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a “mere reference to the fact of settlement” is insufficient to retain jurisdiction to enforce settlement
  • mere reference to the fact of settlement will not by itself incorporate the settlement agreement’s terms into the dismissal order
  • “The phrase ‘pursuant to the terms of the Settlement’ fails to incorporate the terms of the Settlement Agreement into the order because ‘a dismissal order’s mere reference to the fact of settlement does not incorporate the settlement agreement in the dismissal order.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.