In Re Pettit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court generally includes future needs of Debtor in determining what is reasonably necessary as well as Debtor’s existing income and other exempt property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re: Nadine F. Eilbert, Debtor. Nadine F. Eilbert v. David Dennis Pelican Anita L. Shodeen
  Eighth Circuit· 1998-12-07· cited 83×
• In Re Flygstad
  N.D. Iowa· 1986-01-08· cited 52×
• In Re Caslavka
  N.D. Iowa· 1995-02-24· cited 24×
• In Re Huebner
  N.D. Iowa· 1992-04-15· cited 10×
• In Re Wiley
  N.D. Iowa· 1995-07-31· cited 9×
• Rousey v. Jacoway (In Re Rousey)
  Eighth Circuit· 2002-09-13· cited 9×
• Hunter v. Ohio Citizens Bank (In Re Hotchkiss)
  N.D. Ohio· 1988-06-23· cited 9×
• In Re Snyder
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-07-16· cited 7×
• Delaney v. Obuchowski (In Re Delaney)
  D. Vermont· 2001-08-21· cited 5×
• In Re Weidman
  E.D. Michigan· 2002-10-25· cited 4×
• In Re Hutton
  Eighth Circuit· 1990-01-18· cited 3×
• In Re Outen
  D. South Carolina· 1998-03-18· cited 3×
• Fox v. Hutton (In re Hutton)
  Eighth Circuit· 1990-01-18· cited 1×
• Nadine Eilbert v. David Pelican
  Eighth Circuit· 1998-12-07
• Richard G. Rousey v. Jill R. Jacoway
  Eighth Circuit· 2002-09-13
• Commerce Bank v. Robert R. McGowen
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2021-03-12