Skip to main content
· 5/18/1982

In Re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation.

Citations

  • 680 F.2d 5

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing the “necessity for confidentiality [as] essential to fulfillment of the pivotal function of reporters to collect information for public dissemination”
  • plaintiffs failed to question deposition witnesses as to whether oil companies used trade publication to facilitate antitrust conspiracy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.