In Re Petition of Jersey Central Power & Light Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the BPU acted within its discretion in accelerating amortization of electric utility's deferred energy account, which did not result in a rate increase, despite the lack of notice or hearings
• holding that the BPU acted within its discretion in accelerating amortization of electric utility’s deferred energy account, which did not result in a rate increase, despite the lack of notice or hearings
• 4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned
• 4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).