In Re Petition of Fifteen Registered Voters, Cty. of Sussex

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• nine other registered voters had the same surname but none was a candidate
• write-in votes for “Wright” or “Mr. Wright” should be counted for “Harry C. Wright” where evidence showed no other “Wright” sought the office and where “Harry Wright” vigorously campaigned
• write-in votes cast for “Wright” or “Mr. Wright” should have been counted for write-in candidate Harry C. Wright; there was no suggestion in record that any person with the surname “Wright” sought office or authorized candidacy, and Harry C. Wright campaigned vigorously for the write-in vote
• write-in votes cast for \Wright\ or \Mr. Wright\ should have been counted for write-in candidate Harry C. Wright; there was no suggestion in record that any person with the surname \Wright\ sought office or authorized candidacy, and Harry C. Wright campaigned vigorously for the write-in vote

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).