· 8/6/2014
In re Petition for Review of Panel Decision against Panel Case No. 35104.
Citations
- 851 N.W.2d 620
- 2014 WL 3844209
- 2014 Minn. LEXIS 363
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a panel of the Lawyer’s Professional Responsibility Board acted arbitrarily and capriciously because it did not consider the lawyer’s “misconduct as a whole” when it determined what discipline was appropriate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.