Skip to main content
· 11/28/1988

In Re Petition for Haskins

Citations

  • 551 A.2d 65
  • 1988 Del. LEXIS 379

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant does not have a right to hybrid representation
  • stating Superior Court had no duty to consider pro se motions filed by criminal defendant represented by counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Christie, Walsh, Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.