· 11/28/1988
In Re Petition for Haskins
Citations
- 551 A.2d 65
- 1988 Del. LEXIS 379
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant does not have a right to hybrid representation
- stating Superior Court had no duty to consider pro se motions filed by criminal defendant represented by counsel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Christie, Walsh, Holland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.