In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Paul Jody EDLUND, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0336014

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that section 1985(3) requires a “predicate race-based or class-based equal-protection violation”
• recognizing that section 1985(3) requires a “predicate race-based or class-based equal-protection violation”
• “[A]rguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are waived.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[A]rguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are waived.” (quoting Darif v. Holder, 739 F.3d 329, 336 (7th Cir. 2014))
• “[T]he jury's finding of liability on the § 1985(3) conspiracy claim is invalid without a predicate race-based or class-based equal-protection violation. That's a correct statement of settled law.”
• arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).