Skip to main content
S.D. Alabama· 8/10/2001

In Re Peterson

Citations

  • 280 B.R. 886
  • 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 1991
  • 2001 WL 1913163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a watch valued at $3,200 greatly outweighed its utilitarian value and was not “necessary and proper” under Alabama’s exemption statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Margaret A. Mahoney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.