In Re: Pet to Empanel Third Grand Jury-Chester Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discrediting evidence on which convic- tion rested does not revive presumption of innocence
• because parties ‘‘cited no evidence in the record regarding the time required to drive from Bridgeport to New Haven,’’ Supreme Court took judicial notice of distance and driving time between cities in considering petitioner’s failure to adequately investigate claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).