In re Pers. Restraint of Schley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding parents’ right to make decisions concerning the care and custody of their children without government interference was clearly established
• describing the false positive drug test result due to the woman’s ingestion of poppyseed chips
• forcing family to adhere to prevention plan that constrained mother’s ability to be alone with children for approximately two months violated due process rights
• comparing Pittman v. Cuyahoga Cty. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 640 F.3d 716, 728–29 (6th Cir. 2011) with Siefert v. Hamilton Cty., 951 F.3d 753, 765 (6th Cir. 2020)
• “[A] social worker must have reasonable suspicion of child abuse before conducting an in-school interview without a warrant or consent.”
• “In Zinermon v. Burch . . . the Supreme Court limited the reach of the Parratt-Hudson doctrine.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).