In re Perkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that petitioner’s reliance on representations was unreasonable because statutes provided the correct information
• finding that petitioner’s estoppel claim faded because her reliance upon representations contrary to the statute was unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Petition of Chase Home for Children
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2007-06-08· cited 25×
• Thomas v. Town of Hooksett
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2006-07-20· cited 16×
• Kierstead v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2010-09-17· cited 9×
• Petition of New Hampshire Division for Children, Youth & Families
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2007-06-15· cited 1×
• Carleton, LLC v. Balagur
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2012-12-21

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Perkins v. Londonderry Basketball Club
  First Circuit· 1999-11-08· cited 62×
• In re Walker
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1994-05-16· cited 36×
• City of Concord v. Tompkins
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1984-02-03· cited 34×
• In re Dunlap
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1991-07-31· cited 15×
• In re Doe
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-07-03· cited 13×
• Appeal of HCA Parkland Medical Center
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-10-14· cited 12×
• Dow v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-11-30· cited 5×
• Appeal of Kulacz
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2000-07-05· cited 5×