In re Peoples Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “a court that lacks jurisdiction has no power to adjudicate and dispose of a claim on the merits”
• noting that dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction must be without prejudice because court lacking jurisdiction “has no power to adjudicate and dispose of a claim on the merits” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction must be without prejudice because court lacking jurisdiction “has no power to adjudicate and dispose of a claim on the merits” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that a dismissal based on a “defect in subject matter jurisdiction . . . must be one without prejudice, because a court that lacks jurisdiction has no power to adjudicate and dispose of a claim on the merits”
• noting that a dismissal based on a “defect in subject matter jurisdiction . . . must be one without prejudice, because a court that lacks jurisdiction has no power to adjudicate and dispose of a claim on the merits”
• applying Norfolk Southern precedent to, inter alia, vacate “unreviewed” constitutional ruling on Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).