In Re People in Interest of ARS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, “[b]ecause of the statutory authorization, the common-law hearsay objections as to the admissibility of such reports are not applicable”
• considering reports admitted under previous statutory provisions concerning social study and similar reports
• “Because of the statutory authorization, the common-law hearsay objections as to the admissibility of such reports are not applicable.”
• because it is presumed in a trial to the court that the court disregards any evidence that is otherwise inadmissible hearsay, immaterial, or incompetent, the admission of such evidence does not constitute reversible error
• because it is presumed in a trial to the court that the court disregards any evidence that is otherwise inadmissible hearsay, immaterial, or incompetent, the admission of such evidence does not constitute reversible error
• reports in parental severance action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).