Skip to main content
· 7/21/2009

In Re Pennsylvania Title Insurance Antitrust Litigation

Citations

  • 648 F. Supp. 2d 663
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62648
  • 2009 WL 2190669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that, pursuant to Kmart, filed rate “doctrine does not apply where improperly filed rates: (1) make it impossible for the purchaser to calculate the rate to be charged [...]; or (2) are void per se under a statutory or regulatory scheme”
  • “as long as the regulatory scheme requires the filing of rates with a governmental agency that has legal authority to review those rates, the filed rate doctrine applies regardless of the actual degree of agency review of those filed rates”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Yohn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.