Skip to main content
· 10/19/2006

In Re Pennington Seed, Inc. (Mark Formerly Owned by Krb Seed Company, Llc)

Citations

  • 466 F.3d 1053
  • 80 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1758
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 25878
  • 2006 WL 2987658

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Trade- mark Manual of Examining Procedure (“TMEP”) “does not have the force and effect of law”
  • observing that the TMEP “‘is not established law, but only provides instructions to examiners,” yet “[rJepresent[s] the PTO’s established policy . . . that is entitled to our respect”
  • deciding to follow the TMEP’s guidance and describing that, although “the TMEP is not established law,” it does represent the USPTO’s “established policy . . . that is entitled to [the court’s] respect”
  • affirming Board ruling that applicant cannot trademark varietal name for plant seed even if it created genus
  • affirming Board ruling that applicant cannot trademark varietal name for plant seed even if it created genus
  • affirming Board ruling that applicant cannot claim as a trademark the varietal name for plant seed even if it created genus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michel, Lourie, Ellis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.