· 12/2/1988
In Re Pendlebury
Citations
- 94 B.R. 120
- 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 2422
- 18 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 999
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting that the debtor has considerable bargaining power in the reaffirmation process
- “The court would not hesitate in appropriate circumstances to utilize its equitable powers and interject itself into the reaffirmation process.”
- “In practice, reaffirmation hearings presently serve no useful purpose except for debtors filing pro se.”
- court would not countenance overreaching by a secured creditor
- discussing debtor’s “considerable bargaining power” in reaffirmation negotiations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stair
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.