Skip to main content
· 12/2/1988

In Re Pendlebury

Citations

  • 94 B.R. 120
  • 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 2422
  • 18 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 999

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that the debtor has considerable bargaining power in the reaffirmation process
  • “The court would not hesitate in appropriate circumstances to utilize its equitable powers and interject itself into the reaffirmation process.”
  • “In practice, reaffirmation hearings presently serve no useful purpose except for debtors filing pro se.”
  • court would not countenance overreaching by a secured creditor
  • discussing debtor’s “considerable bargaining power” in reaffirmation negotiations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stair

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.