in Re Pedison USA, Inc. and Dickson Ewemade

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \objective evidence of nonobviousness must be commensurate in scope with the claims\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• vacating Board decision that failed to consider whether modifying prior art reference would un- dermine its goal, shared with the challenged claims, of con- structing stable all-terrain vehicles
• vacating Board decision that failed to consider whether modifying prior art reference would un- dermine its goal, shared with the challenged claims, of con- structing stable all-terrain vehicles
• “Even if Polaris is correct that Figure 1 shows a mounting plate that does not extend across the entire passenger compartment, Denney’s specification is broader than the embodiment illustrated in that figure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).