N.D. Ohio· 4/16/1997
In Re Pearson
Citations
- 214 B.R. 156
- 38 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1767
- 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 1192
- 80 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5943
- 1997 WL 671481
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding IRS’ adjustment of proof of claim from secured to unsecured did not constitute settlement requiring removal of underlying lien
- referring to effect of conversion from Chapter 13 to Chapter 7
- delaying lien avoidance until value of underlying collateral paid in full
- in dicta, court stated that if lien were subject to redemption in chapter 7, then debtor could have redeemed property with no additional payment upon conversion from chapter 13 to chapter 7 based on new § 348(f)(1)(B)
- “The general purpose of § 348(f) was to equalize the treatment a debtor would receive under a Chapter 13 case that converted to a Chapter 7 case with the treatment the debtor would receive if he filed a Chapter 7 originally.”
- discussing legislative history and that general purpose behind § 348(f
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richaed L. Speer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hutchinson v. Delaware Savings Bank FSBD. New Jersey· 2006-01-25· cited 48×
- In Re PisculliE.D. New York· 2010-03-18· cited 30×
- Carvalho v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nFirst Circuit· 2003-07-09· cited 29×
- Bogdanov v. Laflamme (In Re LaFlamme)D. New Hampshire· 2008-11-12· cited 15×
- Adams v. Bostick (In Re Bostick)D. Connecticut· 2009-02-02· cited 14×
- Cusato v. Springleaf Financial, Inc. (In re Cusato)E.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-02-06· cited 11×
- Palmer v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Palmer)Sixth Circuit· 1999-02-02· cited 10×
- Pisculli v. T.S. Haulers, Inc.E.D. New York· 2010-03-18· cited 9×
- In Re NicholsS.D. Ohio· 2004-12-14· cited 7×
- In Re JeanS.D. Florida· 2004-02-20· cited 2×
- In Re WallaceE.D. Tennessee· 2001-03-06· cited 1×
- In Re DeanW.D. Tennessee· 2002-08-12· cited 1×
- TVA Employees Credit Union v. WallaceSixth Circuit· 2002-09-13· cited 1×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,346×
- Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 868×
- In Re Benjamin Pierce Simmons, Bankrupt. Benjamin Pierce Simmons v. J.T. SavellFifth Circuit· 1985-07-19· cited 288×
- Richard L. Smith and Deborah L. Smith v. No. 2 Galesburg Crown Finance CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1980-01-15· cited 101×
- In Re Stratford Of Texas, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1981-01-26· cited 53×
- Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers, Local Union 238 v. C.R.S.T., Inc. (Sic)Eighth Circuit· 1986-07-16· cited 46×
- Spadel v. Household Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Spadel)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1983-03-23· cited 42×
- Harstad v. First American Bank (In Re Harstad)D. Minnesota· 1993-06-30· cited 40×
- In Re Murry-HudsonN.D. California· 1992-12-08· cited 29×
- Hirsch v. Citicorp Mortgage Corp. (In Re Hirsch)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-06-25· cited 28×
- In Re LeeD. Minnesota· 1993-07-14· cited 23×
- In Re ShafferN.D. Ohio· 1985-05-08· cited 23×
- In Re FawcettEleventh Circuit· 1985-04-19· cited 22×
- Nefferdorf v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n (In Re Nefferdorf)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1983-02-02· cited 19×
- Premier Resources, Ltd. v. Northern Natural Gas CompanyTenth Circuit· 1980-03-04· cited 17×
- In Re NicewongerN.D. Ohio· 1996-02-28· cited 17×
- In Re LeverettW.D. Oklahoma· 1992-09-29· cited 15×
- United States v. Arrow Air, Inc. (In Re Arrow Air, Inc.)S.D. Florida· 1989-02-08· cited 15×
- In Re EndlichE.D. New York· 1985-03-22· cited 15×
- Gibbons v. Opechee Distributors, Inc. (In Re Gibbons)D. New Hampshire· 1993-12-28· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.