In Re: Paul Alan Leibowitz, Debtor. Paul Alan Leibowitz v. County of Orange Tony Rackauckas, 1 District Attorney of County of Orange

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that costs 26 that benefitted the child were in the nature of support and nondischargeable
• holding that costs that benefitted the child were in the nature of support and nondis-chargeable
• holding that 24 child support payments due to a county were excepted from 25 discharge under former § 523(a)(18) because the expenses the 26 county sought to collect from the debtor benefitted the child
• “The legal question is not whether repayment of the debt will benefit the children ....”
• “If a custodial parent obtains a court judgement for support before she ceases to receive assistance — as did Leibowitz’s wife — her assignment of pre-judgment debts is now valid.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).