In re Patrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that petitioner “easily satisfied]” the prima facie standard
• explaining that although petitioner was sentenced when the Sentencing Guidelines were mandatory, the retroactivity conclusion does not depend on whether the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory or mandatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thomas Hoffner, Jr. v.
  Third Circuit· 2017-09-07· cited 29×
• In re: Octavious Williams
  Eleventh Circuit· 2018-08-01· cited 15×
• United States v. Terrell
  E.D. Washington· 2016-11-04· cited 3×
• United States v. Savage
  C.D. California· 2017-01-12· cited 2×
• United States v. Colasanti
  D. Oregon· 2017-09-26· cited 2×
• United States v. Grupee
  D. Massachusetts· 2016-11-29

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• United States v. Booker
  Supreme Court· 2004-10-01· cited 23,210×
• Teague v. Lane
  Supreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
• Johnson v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2015-06-26· cited 5,137×
• Schriro v. Summerlin
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 2,419×
• Begay v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2008-04-16· cited 1,437×
• Welch v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2016-04-18· cited 1,417×
• Molina-Martinez v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2016-04-20· cited 1,281×
• California Department of Corrections v. Morales
  Supreme Court· 1995-04-25· cited 1,142×
• Peugh v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2013-06-10· cited 771×
• Danforth v. Minnesota
  Supreme Court· 2008-02-20· cited 416×
• United States v. Baker
  Sixth Circuit· 2009-03-16· cited 145×
• United States v. Jesse Pawlak
  Sixth Circuit· 2016-05-13· cited 99×
• In re: Marvin Griffin
  Eleventh Circuit· 2016-05-25· cited 87×
• Beckles v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2016-06-27· cited 69×
• In Re Gregory Lott, Movant
  Sixth Circuit· 2004-04-22· cited 55×
• In Re: Creadell Hubbard v.
  Fourth Circuit· 2016-06-08· cited 53×
• In re Watkins
  Sixth Circuit· 2015-12-17· cited 39×
• In re: Dequintan Arnick
  Fifth Circuit· 2016-06-17· cited 26×
• Raphael Donnell v. United States
  Eighth Circuit· 2016-06-20· cited 25×
• In re: Encinias
  Tenth Circuit· 2016-04-29· cited 22×