· 11/2/1998
In Re PAROLE OF SCHOLTZ
Citations
- 585 N.W.2d 352
- 231 Mich. App. 104
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, while the board need not engage in opinion writing, its explanation must contain sufficient reasons and detail to facilitate appellate review for an abuse of discretion
- holding that, while the board need not engage in opinion writing, its explanation must contain sufficient reasons and detail to facilitate appellate review for an abuse of discretion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Corrigan, Markey, Markman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.