Skip to main content
· 3/21/1994

In re Park Street

Citations

  • 202 A.D.2d 590
  • 610 N.Y.S.2d 811
  • 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a “‘trial court is deprived of jurisdiction over the case during the pendency of’ a State’s appeal and that jurisdiction resumes in the trial court only after “the appellate court’s . . . mandate”
  • holding that a “‘trial court is deprived of jurisdiction over the case during the pendency of’ a State’s appeal and that jurisdiction resumes in the trial court only after “the appellate court’s . . . mandate”
  • holding that a “‘trial court is deprived of jurisdiction over the case during the pendency of’ a State’s appeal and that jurisdiction resumes in the trial court only after “the appellate court’s . . . mandate”
  • holding that a “‘trial court is deprived of jurisdiction over the case during the pendency of’ a State’s appeal and that jurisdiction resumes in the trial court only after “the appellate court’s . . . mandate”
  • holding that a “‘trial court is deprived of jurisdiction over the case during the pendency of’ a State’s appeal and that jurisdiction resumes in the trial court only after “the appellate court’s . . . mandate”
  • holding that a “‘trial court is deprived of jurisdiction over the case during the pendency of’ a State’s appeal and that jurisdiction resumes in the trial court only after “the appellate court’s . . . mandate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.