· 3/19/2013
In Re: Papst Licensing Digital Camera Patent Litigation - Mdl 1880
Citations
- 932 F. Supp. 2d 14
- 2013 WL 1123371
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37432
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because the invented ‘interface device’ is a standalone device that is separate and apart from any data transmit/receive device, the Camera Manufacturers contend that a memory card cannot be both part of the interface device and a data transmit/re-eeive device.... ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Rosemary M. Collyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.