In re Panzer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “absent provision in the arbitration clause itself, an arbitrator is not bound by principles of substantive law or by rules of evidence”
• “a ' broad arbitration clause is held to submit to the arbitrator questions of fraud in the inducement”
• “[a]ny dispute with respect to the obligations of this Paragraph * * * shall be settled by Arbitration” held a broad clause which covered any dispute without limitation
• “[T]he 14 contention that a claim proposed to be submitted to arbitration is in excess of the 15 arbitrator’s power is waived unless raised by an application for a stay.”
• “[A]n arbitrator is not bound by principles of 25 substantive law . . . [and] may do justice as he sees it, applying his own sense of 26 law and equity to the facts as he finds them to be and making an award reflecting 3 1 the spirit rather than the letter of the agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).