Skip to main content
· 12/28/1938

In re Panhandle Producing & Refining Co.

Citations

  • 25 F. Supp. 907
  • 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1528

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • lead plaintiff movants “did not file opposition briefs, and thus the Court deems their applications abandoned or withdrawn”
  • “Two additional movants [for lead plaintiff] . . . did not file opposition briefs, and thus the Court deems their applications abandoned or withdrawn.”
  • lead plaintiff movants “did not file opposition briefs, and thus the Court deems their applications abandoned or withdrawn”
  • noting the lack of “credible proof” in rejecting rebuttal arguments
  • noting the “statutory preference for institutional lead plaintiffs”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nields

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.