· 12/28/1938
In re Panhandle Producing & Refining Co.
Citations
- 25 F. Supp. 907
- 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1528
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- lead plaintiff movants “did not file opposition briefs, and thus the Court deems their applications abandoned or withdrawn”
- “Two additional movants [for lead plaintiff] . . . did not file opposition briefs, and thus the Court deems their applications abandoned or withdrawn.”
- lead plaintiff movants “did not file opposition briefs, and thus the Court deems their applications abandoned or withdrawn”
- noting the lack of “credible proof” in rejecting rebuttal arguments
- noting the “statutory preference for institutional lead plaintiffs”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nields
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.