· 5/17/1957
In re Palter
Citations
- 151 F. Supp. 278
- 1957 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3538
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Defendant has not even come close to meeting any of these requirements and instead relies on mere conclusory statements that the information is protected by the privileg[e]. On such a record, the court cannot sustain the claim of privilege.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Byers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.