Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/14/2018

In re: P.A.

Citations

2018 Ohio 2314

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in concluding that appellant was a mentally ill person subject to court order and, thus, subject to involuntary commitment to a mental hospital. The trial court did not err in permitting the forced medication of appellant with psychotropic medication.

Judges: Klatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

In re J.P.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-30· cited 39×
State v. Weaver
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-30· cited 10×
In re A.C.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-24· cited 5×
In re J.L.S.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-04· cited 2×
Marks v. Raymond
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-24· cited 1×
In re E.S.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-09· cited 1×
In re D.G
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-09-30

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Eastley v. Volkman
Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
State v. Schiebel
Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
In re Miller
Ohio Supreme Court· 1992-02-26· cited 111×
In re Burton
Ohio Supreme Court· 1984-06-20· cited 61×
Steele v. Hamilton County Community Mental Health Board
Ohio Supreme Court· 2000-10-18· cited 46×
In re D.B.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-02-20· cited 5×
In re R.T.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-05· cited 4×

Other cases named In re: P.A.

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

In Re PA
California Court of Appeal· 2006-11-21· cited 1×
In Re PA
California Court of Appeal· 2007-10-02· cited 1×
In Re: P.A.
West Virginia Supreme Court· 2013-02-11
In Re: P.A.
West Virginia Supreme Court· 2014-11-24
In re P.A.
West Virginia Supreme Court· 2018-02-23
In re P.A.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-02-26

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.