Skip to main content
· 6/17/1988

Federal Case

Citations

  • 850 F.2d 342
  • 19 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 35
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8233
  • 17 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1321

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that debtor's subjective needs or perspective were not determinative for purposes of the reasonably equivalent value analysis
  • indicating that a determina tion of reasonably equivalent value is based on a “totality of the circumstances”
  • finding that debtor’s subjective needs or perspective were not determinative for purposes of the reasonably equivalent value analysis
  • “Whether a transfer is made for a reasonably equivalent value is a question of fact.”
  • since reasonably equivalent value is a means of determining if the debtor received a fair exchange in the market place, the inquiry presumes a hypothetical transaction by willing parties unconstrained by the particular financial circumstances of the debtor
  • question of fact reversible only if clearly erroneous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.