In Re Owen F.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in finding that a juvenile had abandoned evidence he sought to have suppressed, this Court assumed, without deciding, that the rule is applicable
• “in the case of a juvenile, courts are called upon to apply ‘a wider definition of custody for Miranda purposes’ ”
• “... [S]earches and seizures incident to an illegal arrest are necessarily unreasonable, Stanley v. State, 230 Md. 188, 192, 186 A.2d 478 (1962
• juvenile’s gesture pointing out stolen goods was inadmissible due to Miranda violations, but stolen goods recovered as result of gesture were admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).