Skip to main content
N.D. New York· 4/13/1998

In Re Owen

Citations

  • 221 B.R. 56
  • 37 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 503
  • 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 562
  • 1998 WL 234702

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that Brighb-Line Test did not establish a per se security agreement and then applying the following criteria in its reversionary interest analysis: (1) whether the option price is nominal; (2
  • explaining that the U.C.C. requires the court to “examine the facts of each case in characterizing a transaction,” but qualifies that requirement by setting forth “a bright line test whereby, as a matter of law, a transaction creates a security interest”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stephen D. Gerling

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.