Skip to main content
· 9/30/1988

In Re Ousley

Citations

  • 92 B.R. 278
  • 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 1801
  • 1988 WL 114563

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • husband’s obligations under security agreements are enforceable where consideration flowed directly to wife rather than to him
  • “[T]he [debtors’] defense of duress is an affirmative one which must be established by the party asserting it.”
  • “[T]he [debtors’] defense of duress is an affirmative one which must be established by the party asserting it.”
  • duress defense to contractual liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbara J. Sellers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.