In re Ostertag
Citations
- 144 Pa. 426
Syllabus
<p>Petitioners to the Supreme Court averred, respectively, that they had presented their applications to the Court of Quarter Sessions of Philadelphia county, for licenses to sell intoxicating liquors at wholesale, etc., under the act of May 24, 1887, P. L. 194; that they were duly qualified applicants, and no remonstrances were filed averring the contrary; and that, after hearing, their applications were refused without reason given;—in each case praying for an alternative mandamus: Writs refused.*</p>
Judges: Clark, Collum, Mitchell, Paxson, Pee, Sterrbtt, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.