In Re Oscar Romero v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the trial court did not err in finding the plaintiff failed to present any evidence that the defendant committed an unfair or deceptive act and in granting a directed verdict to the defendant on the plaintiff's UTPA claim
• holding “[a]lthough the question of reasonableness is generally a question for the jury, [the plaintiff] failed to sustain the initial burden of setting forth sufficient facts to establish a jury question[,]” and thus, a directed verdict in favor of the defendant was appropriate
• \There exists in every contract an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.\
• “[t]here exists in every contract an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).