· 4/3/2002
In Re O.R.
Citations
- 767 N.E.2d 872
- 328 Ill. App. 3d 955
- 263 Ill. Dec. 146
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- appellate court considered issue that was one of first impression in Illinois and raised clear question of law despite its being first raised on appeal; forfeiture was a limitation on the parties, not on the court
- appellate court considered issue that was one of first impression in Illinois and raised clear question of law despite its being first raised on appeal; forfeiture was a limitation on the parties, not on the court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Byrne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.