Skip to main content
· 4/3/2002

In Re O.R.

Citations

  • 767 N.E.2d 872
  • 328 Ill. App. 3d 955
  • 263 Ill. Dec. 146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • appellate court considered issue that was one of first impression in Illinois and raised clear question of law despite its being first raised on appeal; forfeiture was a limitation on the parties, not on the court
  • appellate court considered issue that was one of first impression in Illinois and raised clear question of law despite its being first raised on appeal; forfeiture was a limitation on the parties, not on the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Byrne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.