In re Opinion 452 of the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in determining whether statute of limitations was tolled due to plaintiff’s “disability of unsoundness of mind,” decision “[wjhether or not [plaintiff] had been restored to his right mind, was a question of fact exclusively for the determination of the jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).