In Re Omega Sa (Omega Ag)(omega Ltd.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the refusal to register applicant’s mark in Class 14 unless applicant amended its application to limit “chronographs” to “chronographs for use as watches.”
• upholding examining attorney’s requirement for a more definite identification, notwithstanding applicant’s ownership of several registrations in which the term “chronographs” appeared without further qualification in the identification
• identification too broad for classification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).