In re O.M.

Citations

• 2018 Ohio 2114

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by naming Appellee the minor child's residential parent in the parties' shared-parenting plan. The court did not apply a primary-caregiver presumption in favor of Appellee. Nor did the court ignore the recommendation of the child's guardian ad litem that Appellant be named the residential parent, or ignore the evidence that the child was the victim of domestic violence while with Appellee. Judgment affirmed.