Skip to main content
W.D. New York· 5/29/2002

In Re Oliver

Citations

  • 279 B.R. 69
  • 2002 Bankr. LEXIS 587
  • 39 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 178
  • 2002 WL 1253452

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing debtor’s brother, who had been issued letters of administration by a state court, to appear
  • “By its use of the word ‘may,’ § 707(a) imposes no mandate for the dismissal of any case, but reserves such outcome to the sound discretion of the court in those instances where cause is demonstrated”
  • “By its use of the word ‘may,’ section 707(a) imposes no mandate for the dismissal of any case, but reserves such outcome to the sound discretion of the court in those instances where cause is demonstrated.”
  • discussing analogous provision, § 707(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carl L. Bucki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.