Skip to main content
· 6/15/1992

In Re Oil Spill by Amoco Cadiz

Citations

  • 794 F. Supp. 261
  • 23 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20209
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9228

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • motions for reconsideration cannot be used to raise new legal theories for the first time, raise legal arguments that could have been heard during pendency of previous motion, or present evidence that could have been adduced during the pendency of the original motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norgle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.