In re Ohl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “inference that are supported by only speculation or conjecture will not defeat a summary judgment motion”
• explaining that while the nonmoving party is entitled to all reasonable inferences in their favor, \inferences that are supported by only speculation or conjecture will not defeat a summary judgment motion\
• stating that while non-movant “is entitled, as the nonmoving party, to all reasonable inferences in her favor, ‘inferences that are supported by only speculation or conjecture will not defeat a summary judgment motion’”
• holding a plaintiff’s unsupported inferences do not defeat summary judgment
• “[I]nferences that are supported by only speculation or conjecture will not defeat a summary judgment motion.”
• “inferences that are supported by only speculation or conjecture will not defeat a summary judgment motion” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).