In Re of the United States for an Order Authorizing the Release of Historical Cell-Site Information

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that historical cell site information is protected by the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment
• noting that only reason government seeks CSLI is that it believes CSLI “will provide meaningful information about [defendant’s] past movements”
• application requesting cell site location data for a period of 58 days required warrant based on probable cause
• unpublished order noting written opinion to follow
• In re Application for an Order I
• oral argument held on Oct. 2, 2012

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).