Skip to main content
· 12/19/1979

In re of J. M. A.

Citations

  • 286 N.W.2d 324
  • 1979 S.D. LEXIS 308

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Aeroflex because \we see no basis for an analytical distinction in how an appellate court should review a district court's order on a motion to dismiss based on standing from one regarding personal jurisdiction\
  • city council acting in quasi-judicial role with statutoiy obligations regarding the investigation of facts and the evaluation of those facts
  • city council acting in quasi-judicial role with statutory obligations regarding the investigation of facts and the evaluation of those facts
  • plaintiff-association required to establish standing under the Historic Preservation Act and traditional-associational standing
  • plaintiff-association required to establish standing under the Historic Preservation Act and traditional-associational standing
  • litigant's failure to cross appeal for review of claim precluded its consideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dunn, Fosheim, Henderson, Morgan, Wollman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.