In re O'Bryan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that weight of evidence is within 4 the agency’s discretion and deferring to agency’s decision to 5 afford little weight to spouse’s letter
• holding that this 2 Court “generally defer[s] to the agency’s evaluation of the weight to be afforded 3 an applicant’s documentary evidence”
• holding that agency has 4 discretion to determine weight of the evidence and upholding 5 agency’s rejection of letter from applicant’s spouse
• holding that the weight of evidence is generally in agency’s discretion and deferring to agency’s decision to give limited weight to letter from applicant’s spouse in China
• holding that the weight of the evidence is a 14 matter of agency discretion and deferring to agency’s 15 decision to afford little weight to spouse’s letter
• holding that the weight 10 of evidence is generally in agency’s discretion and deferring 11 to agency’s decision to give limited weight to letter from 12 applicant’s spouse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).