· 6/27/1968
In re O ''Day
Citations
- 30 A.D.2d 223
- 291 N.Y.S.2d 121
- 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3550
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Although the lost earnings award was based solely on plaintiff’s testimony, without supporting documentation, defendant did not challenge the testimony by using plaintiff’s employment records or any other evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.