In Re Notice of Removal Filed by William Einhorn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding divorce proceeding after finding that the district court “lacks jurisdiction over the present case” removed by an ERISA insurance plan
• “To interpret ‘defendant’ [in 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a)] to include non-parties would produce an absurd result and would contravene more than 65 years of jurisprudence that has only allowed removal by ‘defendants’ to claims asserted by a plaintiff.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).