Skip to main content
D. Vermont· 3/8/1991

In Re North

Citations

  • 128 B.R. 592
  • 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 1099
  • 1991 WL 126395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • for the proposition that “where it is obvious the plain purpose” of a governmental unit’s action is “to serve a pecuniary interest,” courts require proof beyond just a “governmental unit’s unsupported explanation that its actions serve public safety, health, and welfare

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Francis G. Conrad

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.