In RE NOMINATION OF deYOUNG

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because a question of whether a party has standing “to maintain an action” does not implicate jurisdiction, our Supreme Court has “consistently held that a court is prohibited from raising the issue ‘of standing sua sponte”
• concluding that because a question of whether a party has standing “to maintain an action” does not implicate jurisdiction, our Supreme Court has “consistently held that a court is prohibited from raising the issue ‘of standing sua sponte”
• noting that our Supreme Court \has consistently held that a court is prohibited from raising the issue of standing sua sponte .\
• noting that our Supreme Court “has consistently held that a court is prohibited from raising the issue of standing sua sponte.”
• noting that our Supreme Court “has consistently held that a court is prohibited from raising the issue of standing sua sponte. Whether a party has standing to maintain an action is not a jurisdictional question.”
• noting that our Supreme Court “has consistently held that a court is prohibited from raising the issue of standing sua sponte. Whether a party has standing to maintain an action is not a jurisdictional question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).